Monday, August 1, 2011

Why Prologues Often Don't Work



Kristin’s incomplete list of why prologues don’t work:

1. When the sole purpose of the prologue is to fill the reader in on the back-story so the real story can begin.

This is so easy to point out but harder to explain.

In the example of UNDONE, Brooke Taylor needed a prologue to show how it all started. To juxtapose who the girls were when they first “meet” versus who they are when chapter 1 begins. The prologue also serves a strong purpose. It sets tone, character, and sets up several questions. Why did Kori become a “I-puke-cheerleaders-for-breakfast” kind of girl? Something has happened but what? Why is Serena obsessed with her by her own admission? And it’s very clear that these two girls have nothing in common in this bathroom scene yet Kori calmly states that they are more alike than Serena knows. They are connected.

This is a prologue with a clear purpose. The reader should want to know more by the end or it doesn’t work. It’s also masterful. Brooke managed to accomplish quite a bit in just 4 short paragraphs and this leads me to the second reason why prologues often don’t work.

2. They are too long.

This is the death of a manuscript if a writer has problem #1 and then it’s combined with problem #2.

3. When the prologue is in a whole different style or voice from the rest of the manuscript.

Then when chapter 1 begins, readers are left flummoxed—especially if that style or tone of voice is never revisited.

4. When the prologue is solely there to provide an action scene to “draw the reader in” but then serves no other purpose or is not connected to the main story arc or is only loosely so.

5. When the prologue introduces the evil character simply so the reader can “know” what is at stake.

I can sum this up in two words. Clumsy writing.

6. When the prologue is supposed to be cool (or I might reword this to say the writer thinks it sounds cool).

Lots of writers overwrite when creating a prologue. It shows.

When all of the above is happening (and there are probably a dozen more reasons why prologues often don’t work), it becomes really clear that the writer isn’t paying attention to dialogue, character development, plot pacing, etc. All key elements of good writing.

This is why almost all the agents I know completely skip the prologue and start with chapter one when reading sample pages. A beginner writer might actually be able to do good character, dialogue, tone, pacing, and whatnot but it’s more than likely not going to show in the prologue.

Now in defense of the prologue, when it’s done well, it’s truly an amazing tool. The number of times I’ve seen a prologue done extraordinarily well in requested submissions? Well, I can count that total on two hands….

Photo by Daniel Hirsh
Kristin Nelson has her B.A. from the University of Missouri at Columbia and is a graduate of the nationally respected University of Denver Publishing Institute. In the early nineties, she studied creative writing with National Book Award Nominee Patricia Henley at Purdue University where she earned her M.A. This makes her particularly interested in representing fiction.
Before opening Nelson Literary Agency, she learned the ropes working for another literary agent. As for her previous work history, Kristin has been a college English teacher, a freelance writer, and a corporate trainer for business communication topics before embracing her true passion of agenting.

Reposted with permission

6 comments:

Katie Ganshert said...

My debut novel has a prologue and thankfully, I think I avoided all the pitfalls you mention here!

I was guilty of number 3 before my in-house editor sent me my revision memo. Thanks to her, my prologue no longer feels like an orphan and the overall story is a lot better for it!

Marc Mattaliano said...

Ya know what, I've sworn by prologues and such for a long time, but even I will say this is a great post to use as a guide, :-)

One of my favorite WIPs right now has a somewhat short prologue that, when you mention these six things, actually made me think about whether or not it's necessary. After all, as I mentally scan what I've written in it, seems like a lot of things are covered effectively later on, even if they're not explicitly stated. However, I do still think its prologue can work.

It doesn't just begin with the reader thrust into a cheesy action sequence to draw them in so I can bore them with pages and pages of nothingness...I don't think it's too long at all, fairly short actually...the voice is slightly different, but the prologue occurs in another world, then the first section begins on Earth, so a different attitude might be understood. What it does do is your #1, set up some backstory.

Thing is, the circumstance described at the end of the prologue thrusts the reader into a mystery situation. Two people have gone through a portal to another world. I don't describe them much at all at the beginning, but at first, it's not necessary. It's a short, general description of what I plan to get into. Nothing about motivations, no deep dark plans from behind enemy lines. Just the lives of two people changing into two completely new lives. I get more into who the main characters are as people AFTER the prologue is over. All the prologue means to do is frame the circumstances of Chapter 1 and give readers a few handfuls of things to question as they go. :-)

I think at times, a prologue can really help give context to a story that's presenting a world that no reader has really experienced before. You can remove that context and allow the reader to discover everything themselves, but when part of the fun is deciphering the mystery, taking that away weakens it drastically.

Like always, it's all about how it's presented. Ya know...I may just consider getting rid of my prologue after all...we'll see, ;-)

Jill Kemerer said...

I don't write prologues because my contemporary romances don't need them, but I do enjoy a good prologue in a historical romance. Sometimes they can set up a cool plot thread!

J. H. Bográn said...

When I first started writing, my favorite author was Clive Cussler. Therefore, I thought all thrillers must have a prologue.

My first novel, Treasure Hunt, has one that may or may not fall into reason #4. However, it passed an acid test: When renamed "Chapter 1", it made no difference on the story development. So, editor and me, kept it as "prologue" mainly for style.

With that said, my new WIP had a prologue, but renamed to chapter 1. It is staying that way.

M.E. said...

I started my first novel with a prologue, but I moved it to Chapter One while adjusting the time table. This eliminated the "dreaded prologue dump." Good advice.

janellemadigan said...

Thanks for this post. I'm one of those people who, if I write a prologue (or critique a manuscript that has one) I'll get rid of those pages and see if the story still works. I find that what's a prologue in a first draft is later back story that is sprinkled throughout the novel.

My current WIP (paranormal romance) does have a prologue, and I seem to have avoided the pitfalls you've mentioned. Only revisions will tell if that particular prologue gets to stick around.

Google Analytics