I was ironing a pale blue, linen, button down shirt — getting ready to meet friends for dinner. I flipped the shirt to iron the back, and smoothed the collar to iron it flat. I did the sleeves and the cuffs, the front, and checked it all again, making sure to get between the buttons (those buggers). And I wondered, on a thirty-minute drive to the restaurant, how was the shirt not going to be wrinkled when I arrived?
And then I remembered, linen is supposed to wrinkle.
As I finished ironing and packed away the spray starch, I thought about writing — and how it’s not much different than linen.
We want our writing to be smooth and pristine, but it’s supposed to have some wrinkles. Wrinkles add personality – make it real. Wrinkles – even in our faces — are signs of who and what we are and where we’ve been.
Wrinkles in writing can be anything from quirks in the method of how we do what we do — to the idiosyncrasies in our characters, language and voice. Often we aspire to writing that looks a certain way – and it’s not that we shouldn’t do our best and make things as perfect as possible. A little wrinkling means you’re not too uptight to live and write fully – to just be yourself and put yourself out there with the little bits that make you — and your writing — uniquely you.
How stiff and unnatural it would be to arrive in an unwrinkled linen shirt and how boring writing would be without the personal wrinkles of each individual author or book or character.
What are the wrinkles in your writing?
Amy Sue Nathan is the editor of STET and the only wrinkles she wants to discuss are the ones in her writing and linen shirts.
You can also find Amy at Women's Fiction Writers.











3 comments:
This post reminded me of a demonstration I've done for my students about sound waves.
We all know that sound is a wave and the frequency of the wave accounts for the pitch of the note. (Someone more knowledgeable than I am can probably express that more precisely--I'm a math teacher, not a music teacher--but I think I've got the gist of it.) But when you record the wave and look at it using software like GoldWave, it's not this pretty wave like the way it might be drawn in a textbook. It's this ugly, hideous, vaguely wave-like thing. Except for one particular sound: the cheesiest "pure" synthesizer sound, that sounds almost more like a MIDI note.
One year I did this demonstration as a team thing with a music teacher, who explained that that "ugliness" was the overtones of each musical instrument. The impurities in the sound, the ways the note deviated from that pure sound, that gave each instrument its distinctive sound.
Play a note with those deviations from perfect wave, and you get a beautiful rich sound. Play a note without one, and it sounds cheesy and fake. (But if it were just a total mess, it would sound awful too.) So basically, if you're close enough to "perfect" and sterile to be recognizable, it's those little deviations that make your voice unique and beautiful and rich.
Anyway, I'm sorry for babbling all over your comments section, but that's what your post made me think of. Good food for thought for a Monday morning! :)
I'd say that my writing is very wrinkled, but not as much as it could be. I have a tendency to listen to the Evil Inner Critic (voices from former critiques, contest judges, etc.)while I write. It keeps me, at times, from flexing my creativity and just "going with the flow," and I try being perfect in the eyes of others. The thing is, it's more important to achieve personal excellence because seeking perfection is too much an ideology that no one achieves.
Refreshing words for a perfectionist writer. My inner editor tends to rip apart my right-brained writing and condemn me without mercy. Argh!
Time to let the wrinkles add some spark to my writing. :) It's okay.
Post a Comment